From a849ab12eab6c12d74c3228ab39f900589475c98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Lawrence Ramsey <pooka109@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 04:13:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix minor inconsistency git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.gnu.org/nano/trunk/nano@1726 35c25a1d-7b9e-4130-9fde-d3aeb78583b8 --- src/winio.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/winio.c b/src/winio.c index a0f07f9b..44a8b981 100644 --- a/src/winio.c +++ b/src/winio.c @@ -46,14 +46,14 @@ static int statblank = 0; /* Number of keystrokes left after * VT220, and VT320. * - NANO_XOFF_KEY is Ctrl-S, which is XOFF under ASCII, ANSI, VT100, * VT220, and VT320. - * - NANO_CONTROL_8 is Ctrl-? (Ctrl-8), which is Delete under ASCII, + * - NANO_CONTROL_8 is Ctrl-8 (Ctrl-?), which is Delete under ASCII, * ANSI, VT100, and VT220, and which is Backspace under VT320. * * Note: VT220s and VT320s also generate Esc [ 3 ~ for Delete. By - * default, xterm assumes it's running on a VT320 and generates Ctrl-? - * (Ctrl-8) for Backspace and Esc [ 3 ~ for Delete. This causes + * default, xterm assumes it's running on a VT320 and generates Ctrl-8 + * (Ctrl-?) for Backspace and Esc [ 3 ~ for Delete. This causes * problems for VT100-derived terminals such as the FreeBSD console, - * which expect Ctrl-H for Backspace and Ctrl-? (Ctrl-8) for Delete, and + * which expect Ctrl-H for Backspace and Ctrl-8 (Ctrl-?) for Delete, and * on which the VT320 sequences are translated by the keypad to KEY_DC * and [nothing]. We work around this conflict via the REBIND_DELETE * flag: if it's not set, we assume VT320 compatibility, and if it is, -- GitLab